Draconian
30th January 2006, 09:49 PM
Similarities between (Girls and Windows)
Girls and Windows
o Both have a great UI.
o Both consume large resources and do less work.
o Both crash unexpectedly.
o Both are not easily portable on different architectures (environment).
o Both can't work on low resource architectures (environment).
o Both are costly to maintain.
o Both give mostly unexpected outputs.
o Both's working often contradicts with their documentation.
o Both are easily prone to viruses (rumors and doubts) (and they
(viruses) do spread very fast in windows based networks).
o In spite of all above disadvantages, both are liked.
Girls and Windows
o Both have a great UI.
o Both consume large resources and do less work.
o Both crash unexpectedly.
o Both are not easily portable on different architectures (environment).
o Both can't work on low resource architectures (environment).
o Both are costly to maintain.
o Both give mostly unexpected outputs.
o Both's working often contradicts with their documentation.
o Both are easily prone to viruses (rumors and doubts) (and they
(viruses) do spread very fast in windows based networks).
o In spite of all above disadvantages, both are liked.