PDA

View Full Version : Guys better take care of your wives


Sunshine
24th April 2007, 12:29 PM
Married woman can live with her lover, says court :)



Can a married woman lawfully live with her lover against the will of her husband? The Rajasthan High Court says yes.

In a judgment on Wednesday, the court allowed a married woman, Manju, to live with her lover, Suresh. “It is improper to pass an order to hand over any unwilling married woman to her husband with whom she does not want to stay,” said justices GS Mishra and KC Sharma. The court also said that nobody should consider an adult woman as a consumer product.

While dismissing a habeas corpus petition filed by Manju’s husband, the court came down hard on the misuse of habeas corpus petitions by people who want to thrust their will upon adult women without their consent. The court said the husband was free to approach the family court for divorce.

Commenting on the judgment, senior Supreme Court advocate and noted women’s rights activist Indira Jaising said, “Though it sounds strange, I am in complete agreement with the high court.”

"At the end of the day an adult woman has a right to decide whom she wants to live with. She can’t be forced to go with her husband against her will," Jaising said.

In this case, Jaising said, it is clear that the woman was prepared for divorce. She also felt that Manju’s husband had abused the habeas corpus petition because such petitions were generally filed when somebody is actually missing.

Asked whether it amounted to adultery, Jaising clarified that the woman could not be prosecuted for this offence under the law. As for the other man, she said, “it seems he is ready to face that”. National Commission for Women Chairperson Girija Vyas said that although it seemed like an important judgment, she could not comment on it since she had not seen it yet.

Manoj Chaudhry, the counsel for Manju and Suresh, had earlier rejected as baseless the allegations that Manju had been kept in illegal confinement by Suresh.

He said that the duo had been living together by their free will and that the relationship had begun even before Manju had got married.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/StoryPage.aspx?id=9e0b7ae6-86f2-4cb8-812e-a71677b4d729

Mastikhor
24th April 2007, 01:19 PM
An old saying

Men are easy to get but hard to keep.

;) :D

Mastikhor
24th April 2007, 01:49 PM
The father of five children had won a toy at a raffle. He called his kids together to ask which one should have the present. "Who is the most obedient?" he asked. "Who never talks back to mother? Who does everything she says?"

Five small voices answered in unison, "Okay, dad, you get the toy."

:)

funnyfaridabadi
24th April 2007, 03:13 PM
The father of five children had won a toy at a raffle. He called his kids together to ask which one should have the present. "Who is the most obedient?" he asked. "Who never talks back to mother? Who does everything she says?"

Five small voices answered in unison, "Okay, dad, you get the toy."

:)

:rofl::rofl:

DreamWeaver
24th April 2007, 03:19 PM
The father of five children had won a toy at a raffle. He called his kids together to ask which one should have the present. "Who is the most obedient?" he asked. "Who never talks back to mother? Who does everything she says?"

Five small voices answered in unison, "Okay, dad, you get the toy."

:)


:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

leleram
24th April 2007, 04:42 PM
The court has rejected the habeas corpus petition..that does not mean that it is legal....the same can be challenged in family court......the court thrashed this pettition becoz such matters does not come under habeas corpus pettition......BTW divorce laws are outdated in indian law:angry:

jhoomroo
25th April 2007, 03:52 PM
where is our society leading to???
if the verdict of the court says that, any adult man/woman is free and can not be forced to live with someone he/she does not wish to live with, why do we need the institution of marriage?why not have live in relationships legalised?

as per ms manju, my personal opinion is that a case of fraud put on her as she married her husband when she was already having an affair with suresh,before marriage she should have started living with suresh, by marring she caused mental,physical, financial harassment to her husband.

funnyfaridabadi
25th April 2007, 05:10 PM
where is our society leading to???
if the verdict of the court says that, any adult man/woman is free and can not be forced to live with someone he/she does not wish to live with, why do we need the institution of marriage?why not have live in relationships legalised?

as per ms manju, my personal opinion is that a case of fraud put on her as she married her husband when she was already having an affair with suresh,before marriage she should have started living with suresh, by marring she caused mental,physical, financial harassment to her husband.

Agree with jhoomroo

Sunshine
25th April 2007, 05:22 PM
why not have live in relationships legalised


And who will be responsible for the childern born out of such livein relations???

Government???

Eshtyle Raja
25th April 2007, 08:10 PM
Bullshit.... What views does court has for the husband ???? Is there any compensation for him...

Only because that female doesnt want to live with him NOW but willfully married to him BEFORE, Should she be allowed for such a swing in her willings ? Doesnt she has some social and moral responsibility ?

What if she again gets willing to stay with someone else ? Would court allow..

All this is bullshit... nothing else but female taking advantage of this poor law..

dund for guy and chhoot for the female... thats the rule.. :angry:

Admin
25th April 2007, 08:36 PM
shaant gada dhari bheem shaant!!

itne gusse mein mat aao...yeh india hai..yahan pe sab suchh chalta hai...

funnyfaridabadi
25th April 2007, 08:57 PM
EB sahi bola, Jaise mahilao ko ajaadi hai, waise hi purush bhi kisi ke bhi saath reh sakte hai.

Admin
25th April 2007, 11:48 PM
arey bhai toh raho na...shaadi ka chakkar kyon daalte ho ;)

funnyfaridabadi
26th April 2007, 12:24 PM
And who will be responsible for the childern born out of such livein relations???

Government???

Why government???

Jo paida karega wahi palega.

You mean that such relations are for entertainment not for responsibilty.

Sunshine
26th April 2007, 12:33 PM
If you are not scared of commitment and responsibility then whats wrong with good old marriages???

PPl want live in relations because they don't want to take any responsibility.

Yeda Anna
26th April 2007, 01:22 PM
Happiness is like penis; always looks small if u hold it in ur hands but when u learn to share it, u'll realize how big & precious it is!

:adore: :adore:

jhoomroo
26th April 2007, 02:16 PM
arrye bhai maine kab kaha live in relationship's sahi hai?

what i ment in my earlier quote was a taunt on the court and women's rights activists. i would like to ask Smt. Girja Vayas that why did they make an issue when Udit Narayan's first wife claimed that he is living with another women and claims that he is married to the other lady? So when Udit Narayan was living with the second lady why did the court gave the verdict in the favour of first wife? and all the women rights activists supported the first wife???????????? he was free to live with anyone like Manju , law is law for everyone
i purely condemn the concept of LIVE-IN- RELATIONSHIP ..!!!!

funnyfaridabadi
26th April 2007, 02:33 PM
If you are not scared of commitment and responsibility then whats wrong with good old marriages???

PPl want live in relations because they don't want to take any responsibility.

Hey hey, in my thinking every relation has its own responsibility and every responsibility comes from a relation, so there is no relationship without responsibility and no responsibility without relationship